Also hoping Mueller's lawyers are working on a plan to make Flood a fact witness to, say, Nunes' obstruction and therefore unable to represent the President.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As much as this vulgarian deserves the full weight of the law headed towards him, I do believe we would all be better served if he had good legal representation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why was he there, unless it was to have an inside track on evidence against Trump?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I said a few weeks ago that Mueller should call Dershowitz in just for shits and giggles since Dersh is on record on CNN saying he wasn't representing him so no AC privilege
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Was Flood there for the meeting or just the beginning, before any information was given out? The reporting I've seen on this makes it unclear.
-
Why would it matter. He had no business being there.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm curious to see what actually happened at the meeting. I would think Flood would be very careful not to get into anything that was problematic as a matter of course.
-
Well, if there’s anything 2016 has taught us, it’s that the appearance of impropriety demands your recusal...Just kidding, that only applies to Democrats.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
when they take back the house...lol
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.