That said, the reporting on the degree to which Ukraine was investigating Manafort has always been problematic.
Show this thread
There's a lot I find sketchy abt this BBC report. Most of all, though, is that Poroshenko (or any Ukrainian politician) would be shocked by bribery going on anywhere, much less a Trump casino. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44215656 …pic.twitter.com/NV4IUSY5ad
-
-
-
Also, I think a REALLY EXCITING story might lay out what kind of evidence on collusion would be in Ukraine (I do think there's evidence there -- so let's see it!!!)
Show this thread -
Also, if you're running some great deal on not investigating Manafort (which wasn't really happening anyway) and only implementing it after he's been indicted here in the US, that's not a great deal. EVEN TRUMP is a better deal-maker than that.pic.twitter.com/JRm2IJbVYd
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
had this reaction too but figured it could mean he was shocked by the directness of the approach coming from a U.S./Europe country in which bribery is typically more circuitous
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe because US sources paid the Ukrainian coup plotters & funds its Nazi brigades, he's shocked US now wants its pawns to pay.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What about faux shock?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.