emptywheel

Hmm you just described Sater

I'm confused by the new MAGA hive mind talking points. Let's assume team trump have not committed a single crime. But the deep state wants to destroy trump, of all people. Is a counter intel case is easier to get evidence for than a criminal campaign? That doesn't sound right

Right. Instead of going after his barely concealed mob ties and graft, they invent a spy caper?

So Halper "faked" being a Republican since.... the 80s? And he's been waiting on his opportunity to do the bidding of the Deep State?

I think the idea is that he's really a Republican, but they used him bc only a Republican could get close to these people. Which is why I pointed out that Russian spies actually have an easier time doing so.

Dems were too.

Which stolen goods were those?

Here you go sticking to rigid framework of "stolen goods." Now I can't bring up the Ukrainians or Uranium 1. Bugger! Not to mention that we haven't seen evidence that Russia provided Trumpworld with anything whatsoever, or that Russia hacked the DNC.

The evidence Team Trump was attempting conspiracy with the Russians (and Saudis and UAE) is legitimate reason for investigation. And we don’t know the answers yet. If you were honest, you would say that the public evidence so far is concerning.

What evidence?

That was a joke. You can hear the audience laughing. The bit that media will love the Russians for putting out the deleted emails is a dead giveaway. The guilty pleas/indictments are unrelated to Trump. All of them. Try again.

Dishonest hack. All of our intelligence agencies concluded Russians undertook efforts to interfere in the election to benefit Trump. Flynn was indicted for lying about calls to Russia to negotiate sanctions relief. You are ignoring facts and propagating lies.