One can take issue w/@ChuckRossDC's attempts to tie Halper to the dossier and his claim that a lifetime Republican asking Republicans questions is "surveillance," but give him his due for breaking this story.https://twitter.com/adamgoldmanNYT/status/997929140136431616 …
-
He leaked his name....
Chuck didn't "leak" anything. And there's no public evidence his stories were results of leaks to him. Nor would it have to be. Don't attack journalism you don't like. Leave that to Trump.
-
-
Definitely not attacking journalism. I have acknowledge that Chuck is a good investigative reporter....
-
I saw that NYT & WaPo declined to release the name in their articles. Chuck's article was the first one that I read which alleged that guy was the informant. I thought it was unprofessional.....
-
If he sourced it to people who believed he was an informant, then no it's not.
-
The FBI said it could endanger the man's life and create other problems for ongoing investigations. IMO, it was irresponsible to publish
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.