I'm not a GOPer and will still allow the techniques may have been valid. But story of probe origins have shifted so drastically since the beginning, the public absolutely needs to learn what was known by who, when? Were there even 4 suspects when the probe started? Based on what?
-
-
A warning incoming NatSec Flynn violating Logan Act by talking to the Russian ambassador as a transition official? Who Comey/FBI interviewers said they didn't believed lied? Basic point here is if you assume campaign was dirty, this stuff was justified. If not, huge problems.
-
Obama warned trump about Flynn in Nov. before the Kislyak callshttps://www.google.ie/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/may/08/obama-warned-trump-michael-flynn-russia-contacts …
-
And? Obama hated Flynn and had fired him. Flynn has been charged w/ nothing but a process crime. It's treason for an incoming president to ignore a request from the outgoing one regarding his staffing choices?
-
You just asked “why weren’t they warned” and now say “so what” when I show you they were
-
If Trump had of listened to this warning there would be no special council.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.