Moreover, plenty of people relying on that story ALSO claim he had a tie to the dossier. I'm laying out he couldn't for the next step in an argument about how the GOP really doesn't think the FBI should investigate spying targets.
A direct quote of tweet claiming Pap is a source for the Millian stuff in the dossier that precedes their meeting isn't good enough? It's a demonstration of mistaken impression that people appear to be taking from Chuck's original story, which is why I wrote my post.
-
-
Well, Marcie, since nobody in the DoJ has forced Steele to divulge who his sources were, and since Mueller has quarantined Papadopoulos away from any and all congressional inquiry, we have to figure things out as best we can, don't we?
-
Sure. I'm just wondering how you think Pap was a source for Millian before they met, and why you think September and May are the same time?
-
We don't know when Papadopoulos first learned about Millian, Marcie.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.