Disagree w/ you about Strassel. Don't necessarily disagree w/ you on inconsistencies in arguments about how FBI should have handled Trump intel. Either way, implications of what this source was up to will be significant. Will test the denials of spying on Trump campaign proper
-
Sorry. You're inventing a detail there. "Inserting a mole into a Republicans campaign." And MOST of what is know is after people left the campaign. Again, post-campaign. Bc FBI waited.
So honestly, you are affirmatively adopting "let's not investigate Russian spying anymore because they're targeting Republicans."
-
-
I said that if there is adequate evidence then investigate away. Your opponent paying a foreign spy for third hand rumors doesn’t amount to enough evidence in my book.
-
Well, as it happens, the person in question had been a CI concern for 3 years by then. 3 years. So that's not why it happened.
-
And you know what intelligence is? Always? Rumors? Is that fucking news to you? Is the problem here that GOPers are just fucking naive about how spying works? Even the ones who oversee it?
-
Do you similarly call for all drug defendants to be released bc they're also found the same way? You want to empty the prisons bc informants were used to fill them? Then do it. But do it consistently. Not just for some twerp who nosed into the Trump campaign.
-
I’ve lost the thread.
-
The thread is that when pressed about what distinguishes 4 year CI concern Carter Page from every other CI concern, you make stuff up. Just pure invention.
-
I’m learning disabled. I’m sorry I couldn’t keep up with your barrage. I will try harder in the future.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.