Gerstein is right: it's important for coverage of Cohen to distinguish what, if anything, makes his influence peddling different (Stormy definitely counts, Russia may or may not) from garden variety DC sleaze.https://twitter.com/joshgerstein/status/994578197714030592 …
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
Raven Onthill Retweeted Joshua Holland 🔥
https://twitter.com/JoshuaHol/status/994571647490412546?s=19 … I suppose you could say this is the end result of a process of expanding corruption. I don't see any reason to permit it. And the court granted Muller a warrant to seize Cohen's files for reasons. The evidence must have been overwhelming.
Raven Onthill added,
Joshua Holland 🔥Verified account @JoshuaHolThere's absolutely nothing standard abt this sleaze. Most lobbyists don't have longstanding ties to organized crime, and they actually do work. Some grifter who can't deliver anything getting millions from companies who don't want to piss off his boss isn't at all typical. https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/994570457067282433 …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RavenOnthill
No. The court granted SDNY a warrant to seize Cohen's files.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
True. There is little doubt, however, these things are related. It seems to all be melting into this one giant vat of poison.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Sure. But it's critically important to note that USG has shown probable cause for crimes that are not necessarily about Russia. We don't yet understand how/when/how much got referred to SDNY. But it's important to maintain that distinction for now.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.