Note, another oddity abt this hearing: Haspel introduced by former committee members, not by a home state senator (I think).
-
-
Gonna interject here: the moment to establish that we can't have torturers lead CIA was actually Brennan, not Haspel. Dems failed that test.
Show this thread -
Burr: I would remind members that we are in an open session. Did Burr actually give Wyden the side eye when he asked that?
Show this thread -
Burr pitches the video destruction as entirely Rodriguez' decision. "The tape issue had lingered at CIA for a period of about 3 years. A great deal of concern about security risk to CIA officers depicted on tapes."
Show this thread -
Haspel: Rodriguez has made it very clear that he and he alone made the decision. I did not appear on those tapes as has been alleged.
Show this thread -
Note: the claim this was about protecting officers doesn't make sense for reasons I'll go into later.
Show this thread -
Haspel: The official record is the cable record, we use that to detail all our operations. [So why is that not sufficient to do a SSCI report off of? That makes NO SENSE.]
Show this thread -
In her description of legal/policy issues behind destroying tapes so far, Haspel hasn't mentioned the active request from Carl Levin for tapes.
Show this thread -
Haspel says there was a HPSCI investigation that never produced a report. She says HPSCI Chair found no problem. That's VERY curious given that Pete Hoekstra had a briefing the day of the destruction.
Show this thread -
Warner: Were you aware of Senator Levin's actions [proposing 9/11 style commission]? Warner: Were you aware of those actions [from multiple opposing view points] Haspel: I recall security concerns, I don't recall pending legislation.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.