Warner asks Haspel how she works with Trump and whether she can speak truth. "Will you be in the room when it matters and will the President listen to you?"
-
-
It is not my way to trumpet fact I would first first woman, but woman across the IC consider it a good sign for their prospects.
Show this thread -
"Reaction of work force to rare nomination of one of their own, someone who has been in the trenches, has been overwhelming."
Show this thread -
Haspel now bragging about what is fundamentally selective declassification in support of her nomination.
Show this thread -
Haspel talking about volunteering on 9/11. "I didn't leave for 3 years."
Show this thread -
"It was CIA who identified and captured Osama bin Laden." SEAL propagandists go nuts!
Show this thread -
Haspel answers a different question than Warner asked: whether CIA will restart torture, not whether it was wrong.
Show this thread -
"In retrospect it is clear CIA not prepared to conduct detention program." LOLOLOL. Rather than saying it is not legal to torture, she says it is not legal to use techniques not in AFM. VERY curious phrasing.
Show this thread -
"CIA cannot be effective w/o people's trust." Hailing Congressional oversight process. Note, in her description of torture she didn't address destroying a video that Congress had asked for.
Show this thread -
Gonna interject here: the moment to establish that we can't have torturers lead CIA was actually Brennan, not Haspel. Dems failed that test.
Show this thread -
Burr: I would remind members that we are in an open session. Did Burr actually give Wyden the side eye when he asked that?
Show this thread -
Burr pitches the video destruction as entirely Rodriguez' decision. "The tape issue had lingered at CIA for a period of about 3 years. A great deal of concern about security risk to CIA officers depicted on tapes."
Show this thread -
Haspel: Rodriguez has made it very clear that he and he alone made the decision. I did not appear on those tapes as has been alleged.
Show this thread -
Note: the claim this was about protecting officers doesn't make sense for reasons I'll go into later.
Show this thread -
Haspel: The official record is the cable record, we use that to detail all our operations. [So why is that not sufficient to do a SSCI report off of? That makes NO SENSE.]
Show this thread -
In her description of legal/policy issues behind destroying tapes so far, Haspel hasn't mentioned the active request from Carl Levin for tapes.
Show this thread -
Haspel says there was a HPSCI investigation that never produced a report. She says HPSCI Chair found no problem. That's VERY curious given that Pete Hoekstra had a briefing the day of the destruction.
Show this thread -
Warner: Were you aware of Senator Levin's actions [proposing 9/11 style commission]? Warner: Were you aware of those actions [from multiple opposing view points] Haspel: I recall security concerns, I don't recall pending legislation.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.