Trump specifically refers to "Russian collusion" being a witch hunt, and I think he's right on that. So much time and nothing to show for it.
-
1. Not an offer to conspire. 2. Meeting was about sanctions, dirt was mentioned, but dirt was about Clinton's dealings in Russia, not hacked emails or troll farms. 3. Plea was about lying to FBI about discussing sanctions after the election.
1. It was RU offering to help by releasing emails. 2. How do you know dirt was abt Clinton's dealings in RU? You heard the convos bt Don Jr and Emin? You know what Don Jr referred to w/"if it's what I think"? 3. It was abt lying abt saying hold off on retaliating we'll deal.
-
-
1. Getting political oppo is not a crime. That meeting had nothing to do with DNC/Podesta emails anyway, as far as we know. 2. Is there any indictment that the meeting was about a conspiracy? There were lots of people there. 3. What's your evidence of this?
-
Ah, I see how you're splitting these things up to avoid the obvious. You're working awfully hard there! Three different compartmented brains to maintain your beliefs.
-
I really don't care either way. I doubt the campaign conspired with Russia to do anything illegal because it just doesn't make sense. Russia wanted to hurt Clinton, they didn't need a promise from Trump in order to hack her, and they certainly didn't need technical assistance.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.