Have you read @emptywheel's series on the questions? This post--on Mueller's theory of conspiracy to defraud the US--is also really helpful: https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/03/28/mueller-prepares-to-reveal-the-first-cards-in-the-hack-and-leak-conspiracy/ …
-
Big kudos for spelling all these names right! And I appreciate the spacing; my eyesight sucks. Feel free to link--I'd love to look. But, again, it seems you're latched on to the facts that fit what you hope is true, rejecting some other facts, and so....
It helps to have a PhD involving a slavic language. But thanks for applauding my ability to spell when you're still struggling to find a single fact.
-
-
One final thought, then dinner. I've had people set meetings with me on false pretenses to pitch what turned out to be conspiracy theories. You know what they said, when I told them as politely as I could that they were, well, not right? They said ... prove it.
-
That's irrelevant to the point you have failed to substantiate. This is a question abt who got the meeting. The record is uncontested that it was Goldstone, and thru him Agalrov. That changes Q of the why substantially.
-
I'm happy to entertain a theory (not the one you made) that Goldstone and Agalarov lied. That might be consistent w/known facts, unlike your claim. Except there's a whole lot more baggage & history & direct phone calls once you get to the Agalrovs.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.