What stuff? I mean, you got to game it out. If the government has evidence the president committed a crime, but can’t indict because of a temporary immunity, you’ve got to ask about SOL/tolling/etc.
-
I apologise for sharing a point of view that is too hard for you to engage with. I will now leave your echo chamber. Peace.
The view that asks for *a single fact* to back up a claim you made? Well, yeah. Sorry. I'm a stickler for believing that boys who can't summon a single solitary fact to support their argument are not, themselves, the ones to lecture about made up reality.
-
-
For the record, you rejected a NYT article. I'm not so obsessed about this as to have it all at my fingertips--super happy about that , now that I think of it. I'm a stickler for believing that liberal girls who sneer at the NYT are just playing games. Or something. Again, peace.
-
Yes. I rejected a NYT narrative bc you don't want narratives, you want facts. Veselnitskaya has explained how that meeting got scheduled (and not by her). There are emails that explain it. Neither accords w/your version.
-
Big kudos for spelling all these names right! And I appreciate the spacing; my eyesight sucks. Feel free to link--I'd love to look. But, again, it seems you're latched on to the facts that fit what you hope is true, rejecting some other facts, and so....
-
It helps to have a PhD involving a slavic language. But thanks for applauding my ability to spell when you're still struggling to find a single fact.
-
One final thought, then dinner. I've had people set meetings with me on false pretenses to pitch what turned out to be conspiracy theories. You know what they said, when I told them as politely as I could that they were, well, not right? They said ... prove it.
-
That's irrelevant to the point you have failed to substantiate. This is a question abt who got the meeting. The record is uncontested that it was Goldstone, and thru him Agalrov. That changes Q of the why substantially.
-
I'm happy to entertain a theory (not the one you made) that Goldstone and Agalarov lied. That might be consistent w/known facts, unlike your claim. Except there's a whole lot more baggage & history & direct phone calls once you get to the Agalrovs.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.