This is fantastic (as usual). It didn't even seem to occur to most mainstream commentators that Mueller is more likely to build his questions into a narrative structure already in evidence than to toss some balls up at the buzzer & see if anything happens to find the net.
I've got a thus far 4 part series on the structure Sekulow's questions suggest the Mueller investigation might have. Parts 1-3 are here: Part One https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/05/02/the-mueller-questions-map-out-cultivation-a-quid-pro-quo-and-a-cover-up-part-one-cultivation/ … Part Two https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/05/02/the-quid-pro-quo-a-putin-meeting-and-election-assistance-in-exchange-for-sanctions-relief/ … Part Three https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/05/03/the-quo-policy-and-real-estate-payoffs-part-three/ …https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/992516285136363521 …
-
-
-
Well, this is Sekulow's narrative, but part of the problem is 1) no one, admittedly in cluding me, really has a good explantion for the Flynn firing 2) most commentators are unduly fixated on obstruction.
-
Re: this being Sekulow's narrative, my assumption is that Sekulow is at least smart enough to have produced as faithful a copy of Mueller's subjects as possible.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
-
Fixed. Thanks.
-
love your work, thank YOU
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Agree that's evidence but not specifically mentioned in the questions, perhaps because what Trump does as POTUS is not going to be prosecutable.
-
god, that makes it sound even worse for the president
End of conversation
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.