Could you give a brief explanation as to why they would do this rather than the wire tapp? (Or however you spell it) It seems kind of vague but I'm not sure what it means, so...
I was out. Are we at the BREAKING OF COURSE THE FEDS HAD A PRTT ON COHEN THEY HAD TO FIGURE OUT WHICH EMAILS TO READ stage of retraction?
-
-
-
Feds get PRTT w/a relevance standard. No evidence of probable cause required. But we know they did get Cohen's stored comms. Getting call records of who he emailed or texted would provide a kind of index to figure out which comms to read.
-
I think that's what she meant by the "PRTT".
-
Yup, Pen Register Trap & Trace.-https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-II/chapter-206 …
-
Thanks!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I have seen this suggested, yes
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Pretty much. You were right.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.