They may not be able to charge him with a crime.
Note with Papadopoulos, they just asked for another month, not two (tho he has been cooperating for a lot longer already). https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.189898/gov.uscourts.dcd.189898.36.0_2.pdf …https://twitter.com/MikeScarcella/status/991419892485193728 …
-
-
-
Umm he’s already confessed and plead guilty to a crime. This is specifically about “sentencing”
-
Unless the judge's orders for any exculpatory evidence end up with the plea being set aside.
-
That's a conspiracy theory sown by cynical people who don't understand Sullivan.
-
No, that's what he actually did and he wouldn't have ordered that if there weren't some merit to the possibility that the plea was obtained under false pretenses.
-
Hi. The fact that Sullivan does this ALL THE TIME has been covered in language so simple even you might understand it. Please don't be such a chump for conspiracy theories. It makes you look pathetic.
-
Does what all the time? Demand prosecutors turn over previously withheld exculpatory evidence? So what? You're not disputing he has done that here, so stop with the "conspiracy theories" nonsense.
-
Yes. For every plea he demands they turn over exculpatory evidence. Every single one. Every. Single. One. Had he seen something, you would have heard about it months ago.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Papadopoulos should fight the charge on the bases that the mistatements were not material and the indictment was contrary to 2014 DoJ guidelines.
-
Lying about whether you told the campaign about leaked emails is not material to an investigation into whether the campaign did anything wrt leaked emails?
-
Read the indictment, he was charged about lying when joined the campaign. It is certainly not material and the indictment was made contrary to DoJ guidelines for charging under 18 USC § 1001.
-
Hmm. This one can't read.
-
You cannot argue so you insult. Plus there was no conspiracy charge attached to the indictment.
-
I COULD argue. But arguing with someone who believes there was a Papadopoulos indictment would be fruitless.
-
I for once appreciate you taking the time to take these trolls to task. It's amusing to see people going to lengths to pretend they know what the fuck they're talking about arguing with people who really know a specific matter b/c..why not, Twitter let's you.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Any theories on why two different time frames other than Papadopoulos has been cooperating longer? Do you think something will be happening within a month
-
As a threshold matter, they may want to hold Flynn until they get to seized materials from Cohen
-
See this is why I seek your thoughts! That makes sense.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
doesn't this suggest that Mueller will be acting on this Flynn flip in the next two months?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.