Read your piece. My feeling was one of confusion after I watched the show. Really bad editing. Everybody is yelling, "Eureka!" and I'm like, WTF.
-
-
-
Hope it helped.
-
It always helps when someone says they saw the same thing. That way I don't feel goofy like I missed something. Lot's of hype, and they continue with it. Pretty clear prior to this media constructed Gestaltic "revelation."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why did trump make a big deal of it last night in his speech though? It made me think there's something to it.
-
Because he's in so deep he has to knee jerk find a way to spin everything?
-
Yeah I guess that's plausible.
-
The interesting thing about Trump's remarks about the lawyer, please don't make me type her name, is that she takes direction from Putin according to Trump.
-
Right; I'm just wondering if he inadvertently revealed his own knowledge of something .... he does have terrible judgment about that sort of thing!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He didn’t have to mention it. So if Trump’s remarks were a ‘spin’, then, hell yes, let’s hope he continues. And what truly was a ‘hack’ job was the editing, totally agree. Upshot: DJT foams from the mouth. Great result even if it wasn’t passable journalism.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Appreciate the context. Too bad MSNBC messed this up.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
She's a spy, pure and simple.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Marcy, I'm already way too backlogged on your posts.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.