Thousands of East Germans were 'confidential informants' for the Stasi in GDR, and same in Poland. Anyone needing or wanting to preserve useful govt. access played the game. Question is whether she's more than that.+
-
-
Replying to @RickPetree @blankslate2017 and
Ah, but almost all of those those Germans were not informing the head of Stasi!
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @DmitryDibenko @blankslate2017 and
True enough. But some were, no doubt. Depends on where they stood in the pecking order. Whatever else she may prove to be, NV was certainly well connected, and came from rags to riches quickly as a result.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RickPetree @blankslate2017 and
The key difference in this case I think is that informing is passive, but actively working on behalf is no longer informing, it's being full agent - which is exactly what she did, but used weaker word that misrepresents her actions in vain hope to explain
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @DmitryDibenko @RickPetree and
She actively worked on behalf of a known client?!?!?!?! SCANDAL!!!
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @RickPetree and
She broke lots of US laws in the process of this "work"
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @DmitryDibenko @RickPetree and
Um. No. RU (not she) violated an MLAT treaty. Again, this is why knowing wtf MSNBC showed is important. You're making stuff up again.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @RickPetree and
You'll see once she is indicted by the FBI, should be this side of Xmas
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DmitryDibenko @emptywheel and
I'd love to see that happen, and will be curious to see the grounds on which she can be charged. Doubt it will be in relation to things discussed in this thread. Maybe in relation to RU interference in US election, but that's a different matter.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RickPetree @DmitryDibenko and
Per the interview, the suggestion is that she told the RU gov't to lie or provide misleading information to the court regarding a questionnaire on Prevezon (and RU gov't obliged). That could be obstruction of justice depending on the substance of the edits involved.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
I suppose it's possible. I don't imagine DOJ going there with an MLAT response. Could be dangerous precedent for the US.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.