In Russian it has got slightly different meaning, but she obviously did not want to use more correct words like "agent" or "operative"
-
-
Replying to @DmitryDibenko @LazyDogTweets and
"Informant" in Russian got closer meaning to "confidential informant" CI as used in police, but given that she was "informing" whilst being abroad that makes her a spy
1 reply 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @DmitryDibenko @LazyDogTweets and
She was describing providing info to the prosecutor that they would use to deny US legal request (which we do all the time on the equivalent RU requests for Browder's arrest), no?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @LazyDogTweets and
What it means is that she lied in the past claiming she did not work for the Russian Govt, she had to say it because of reports that emails to that effect were found, so she tried to label it as "informant" - did not work out as she expected
2 replies 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @DmitryDibenko @LazyDogTweets and
Uh, what scrap of proof was there that she was working for the RU govt? Is there some secret transcript of the interview that provides any?
4 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @DmitryDibenko and
Interview states that based on the email she edited the response provided by the Russian government to a US questionnaire (authorized by a US court) re: her client. The point is she/RU gov't were to be independent of each other and they weren't.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @blankslate2017 @emptywheel and
No Q, based on emails, that she advised the Prosecutor General on RU govt's response to USG request for coop in obtaining documents potentially harmful to *her client* in a U.S. criminal prosecution. That undoubtedly crossed some lines, at least in terms of U.S. practice.+
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RickPetree @blankslate2017 and
The U.S. case in which she was involved was politically sensitive for the Russians. So maybe not a total surprise they'd be guided by someone known to and trusted by them, who was on the spot in the courtroom.+
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RickPetree @blankslate2017 and
It was also one she is the known attorney on. Which is why I asked what Browder's lawyers would do in the same context.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @blankslate2017 and
Yes, w/ slight caveat that, because she's not admitted to the bar in the U.S., she was not formally part of the U.S. defense team. Nevertheless, as the AUSA in the Engel program noted, she was the 'driver' of defense strategy.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
There is no contest she is Katsyv's attorney. That's what the MLAT was for, info on his money laundering.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @blankslate2017 and
No question about the Katsyv representation. Just pointing out that she's not attorney of record in the U.S., for formal reasons.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.