She did seem feisty, defensive and angry at various times.
-
The U.S. case in which she was involved was politically sensitive for the Russians. So maybe not a total surprise they'd be guided by someone known to and trusted by them, who was on the spot in the courtroom.+
It was also one she is the known attorney on. Which is why I asked what Browder's lawyers would do in the same context.
-
-
One point I don't believe the Engel interview established was whether the edits she suggested in the Ru govt. response to US were acted upon. Was an official response ever submitted, and does it incorporate her edits ?
-
It was. What SHE contested (or at least did not confirm) is that the actual track changes doc was hers. She admitted that the language from it is what she used in court filings.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, w/ slight caveat that, because she's not admitted to the bar in the U.S., she was not formally part of the U.S. defense team. Nevertheless, as the AUSA in the Engel program noted, she was the 'driver' of defense strategy.
-
There is no contest she is Katsyv's attorney. That's what the MLAT was for, info on his money laundering.
-
No question about the Katsyv representation. Just pointing out that she's not attorney of record in the U.S., for formal reasons.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.