It was essentially an Engel special, and NBC chose the Maddow slot b/c of her numbers (which are, deservedly, the highest on cable). Richard is Chief Foreign Correspondent for one of the Big 3 U.S. nets, so from Veselnitskaya's pov, it doesn't come any loftier than that.
-
-
Replying to @RickPetree @kylegriffin1
I think Boris Epshteyn would’ve informed Putin that Engel’s specials run at Maddow’s spot and are a part of her podcast versions. She didn’t choose RT or Fox for this.
1 reply 8 retweets 39 likes -
Replying to @blankslate2017 @kylegriffin1
Yes, Russians chose to go w/ Engel. But I don't assume that Veselnitskaya expected to end up confirming her GRU identity. I think Richard legitimately shook her up w/ the emails connecting her to the Prosecutor General and, to some extent, squeezed the 'confession' out of her.
8 replies 22 retweets 96 likes -
Replying to @RickPetree @kylegriffin1
She did seem feisty, defensive and angry at various times.
1 reply 3 retweets 20 likes -
She didn't seem to understand how we would interpret "informant". The translation seems obvious but maybe it's like living where jaywalking is so common people don't think of it as illegal. Perhaps being an informant in Russia doesn't have the same implications as in the US.
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @LazyDogTweets @blankslate2017 and
In Russian it has got slightly different meaning, but she obviously did not want to use more correct words like "agent" or "operative"
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @DmitryDibenko @LazyDogTweets and
"Informant" in Russian got closer meaning to "confidential informant" CI as used in police, but given that she was "informing" whilst being abroad that makes her a spy
1 reply 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @DmitryDibenko @LazyDogTweets and
She was describing providing info to the prosecutor that they would use to deny US legal request (which we do all the time on the equivalent RU requests for Browder's arrest), no?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @LazyDogTweets and
What it means is that she lied in the past claiming she did not work for the Russian Govt, she had to say it because of reports that emails to that effect were found, so she tried to label it as "informant" - did not work out as she expected
2 replies 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @DmitryDibenko @RickPetree and
Thank you -- as I understand you, she meant that she was passing information from the Russian gov't to the Trump campaign, but was (mis)understood to say she was gathering information to pass to Russia. Which she was, but not in the covert sense that "spy" implies.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like
Not given the context of the interview, no. The (partly contested) docs in question show her giving the prosecutor language to use in refusing an MLAT request. It only has to do w/TT meeting bc of her claimed relationship w/RU gov.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.