There is an interesting inaccuracy here that HPSCI should have been able to avoid.pic.twitter.com/pCjJlPSjvv
Show this thread
Resuming my thread on the HPSCI report which is here: http://vice.com/en_us/article/vbpgv3/nunes-memo-all-the-key-details-republicans-left-out … Earlier threads: https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/989872678558470145 … https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/989916600739430400 … Missing a bit from the plane which I'll cycle back to.
-
-
-
Again, wrong emails here. These were presumed to be Clinton Foundation but ended up being Podesta.pic.twitter.com/sK3P3jM9KL
Show this thread -
HPSCI provides an explanation for Stone's "Podesta time in a barrel" comment that differs significantly from his prior explanations. It's better than past descriptions in not taking Tony for John. But on top of being inconsistent it still makes no sense.pic.twitter.com/8AYJDFyswF
Show this thread -
HPSCI depends very heavily on Sessions testimony to explain away Papadopoulos. This includes the bulk of quoted Sessions testimony, and doesn't quote from others better placed to rebut Papa.pic.twitter.com/tqhb2mJGYX
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.