3 of the 4 or 5 people first investigated have been charged but we're going to keep THOSE 3 names redacted bc...pic.twitter.com/HXW5CbfZ7m
Show this thread
-
A report released by Devin Nunes says no credible evidence supports the "alternative actor" theories.pic.twitter.com/j469tpK8pA
Show this thread
-
-
The references to these footnotes are redacted. But at least
@JasonLeopold will know what to FOIA.pic.twitter.com/cng1vzYmX4
Show this thread -
There are a number of places where the treatment of Guccifer 2.0 is insufficiently critical and reliant on dated analysis. But this one is particularly weak, given the analysis of the files in question and the dismissal, elsewhere, of counter explanations.pic.twitter.com/Cm7mcNadnk
Show this thread -
HPSCI relies on a problematic NYT article to support claim that Wikileaks benefits RU. The case can be made, but HPSCI should in no way rely on that article.pic.twitter.com/uxFWHoCtPQ
Show this thread -
In recent years Wikileaks has also released versions of declassified Kissinger files and FOIAed Hillary emails. Plus, Wikileaks released Syria files the US had a hand in stealing.pic.twitter.com/o7QuiOBR30
Show this thread -
Another place where the report doesn't mention the IRA indictment.pic.twitter.com/CDtC2HiBpE
Show this thread -
No mention of how Trump's spawn and aides magnified
@TEN_GOP.pic.twitter.com/TGvRMWMSks
Show this thread -
There are methodological problems w/HPSCI's treatment of RU use of social media that others will cover in more depth. In short, they don't consider the non-paid use of SM (except by RT) at length, especially WRT relative impact.
Show this thread -
-
Note HPSCI doesn't distinguish between hack attempt and hack victim.pic.twitter.com/BIonZ0PndQ
Show this thread -
PDF 52/p 42 has a description of what DHS did that is a more detailed a nuanced version of efforts to warn states than has been publicly reported.
Show this thread -
This is a Susan Rice quote. "Awaiting 'with urgency'" is a curious construction; I wonder if it was quoted faithfully.pic.twitter.com/PwVS0K7DKq
Show this thread -
Gonna break here to head to the airport. Will resume in a new thread once I check in.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Interesting that these redactions aren't bc classified (the paragraph is marked U and it's not been struck out). They're just redacted.
-
Yup. Tons of U paragraphs are redacted.
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Guccifer 2.0 seemed sketchy. Anyone can claim responsibility and the fact is that there were 2 sets of DNC files makes it even sketchier. One with east coast metadata and one potentially using the CIA marble framework to frame Russia (and/or discredit journalists).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Funny, it's *only* Crowdstrike which has attributed the DNC hack with anything approaching substantiation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.