IIRC, it was pretty clear that FISC was a kangaroo court with a rubber stamp, and before we had that reporting, they never rejected anything.
Reupping this thread to warn off those picking up the claim that "FISC rejected more apps last year than ever before in history." We don't have the data to make that claim.https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/989375858078076928 …
-
-
-
Um. No. You know why? Bc we know what the reports that use the same standard say. They haven't changed.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Let’s say the premise is true, than don’t we have solid evidence that the process changes when it is opened to even minimal public scrutiny?
-
No, we do not. Premises don't work in Courts of Law.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.