[Silently hopes to self the DNC lawsuit will be more competently managed than the Fusion oppo research.] [Oh did I say that out loud?]
Show this thread
-
-
I'm more curious why Aaron Nevins—the guy who actually admitted to soliciting and accepting stolen DCCC data—wasn't named.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Unnecessary to plead imho.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why isn't that a sufficient allegation? It expressly pleads (e)(2) ("protected computer"), and while it doesn't expressly plead that their computers are "computers" as defined by (e)(1), that's included in the (e)(2) statutory definition that was plead. /1
-
If I allege that "Defendant is a citizen of the United States by birth under Section 1 of the 14th Amendment," do I really also need to separately plead that "Defendant is a 'person' as used in Section 1 of the 14th Amendment"? /end
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.