The govt has been threatening a superseding indictment v/@MalwareTechBlog for some time (at least to fix their fuck-ups, but possible to charge him w/something w/US victims?), but had seemed to back off recently. Here they say they plan on it.https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4441095-Brief-in-Opposition-to-Motion.html …
-
-
Hello security researchers!! Here the govt is arguing that SHARING malware w/someone in the US may constitute wiretapping.pic.twitter.com/fOzqHYbmqs
Show this thread -
I'm being an asshole but I find this typo, "overact," funny.pic.twitter.com/lZGcvCDkN2
Show this thread -
.
@MalwareTechBlog: Show us the 10 computers damaged under CFAA. Govt: No.pic.twitter.com/C4MKGzVipf
Show this thread -
Hey
@OrinKerr: EDWI just called you device argument (which@MalwareTechBlog adopted) "convoluted." Fighting words.pic.twitter.com/xW41gYN5La
Show this thread -
You always gotta laugh when the *US* govt relies on an OED definition, not Merriam Webster, to support their word games. MW def ls: "software designed to interfere with a computer's normal functioning."pic.twitter.com/9JokghI6jL
Show this thread -
I expect before we're done govt will say, "Welp, Hutchins is British so of COURSE he takes his understanding of a word that is part of his alias, malware, from the OED. But we also expect him to understand US Miranda rights."
Show this thread -
I'm confused.
@MalwareTechBlog is primarily accused of manufacturing malware. But not even his malware-sending defendant was wiretapping.pic.twitter.com/po5cOxT4er
Show this thread -
Malware is a device because it was advertised on YouTube.pic.twitter.com/u2et9KiNjL
Show this thread -
Page 10 of the brief spends an entire page digging through dictionaries for a definition that helps the govt. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4441093-Brief-in-Opposition-to-Motion.html … As someone w/a PhD in language games, even I find this ridiculous.
Show this thread -
In a brief that spends 1.5 pages pointing to definitions in online dictionaries and related reference materials, USG says to ignore what
@MalwareTechBlog says about online dictionaries.pic.twitter.com/uY6fzEj3io
Show this thread -
I'm NAL. But aren't lawyers supposed to cite the relevant case law when they make assertions like this?pic.twitter.com/6lSC56pAHd
Show this thread -
Interjection: Yes, the government (more specifically, non-specialist prosecutors from Wisconsin) is actually malware-splaining to a guy named
@MalwareTech.Show this thread -
.
@MalwareTechBlog, a second time: Please show me the 10 computers damaged under CFAA. USG (after having said "no" once): Let me redefine that as "how malware works." https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4441092-Brief-in-Opposition-to-Motion.html …pic.twitter.com/UrMSxdszTm
Show this thread -
Note: elsewhere in this package of briefs, the govt says
@MalwareTechBlog tried to dismiss the indictment when he should have asked for a Bill of Particulars. Here, they're saying he can't have a Bill of Particulars.Show this thread -
Aside from the other dickish aspects of this passage (not least that
@MalwareTechBlog never claimed he didn't understand English), the swipe "self-proclaimed" is pretty obnoxious. Also, what does attending DefCon have to do with understanding English?pic.twitter.com/Busy8ZubkO
Show this thread -
USG has *just* made a big deal out of whether someone does or does not understand English. But here, they're suggesting
@MalwareTechLab should have taken the question, "Are you drunk?" to mean, "Are you drunk, doped, or tired?"pic.twitter.com/JhCfKUlrKs
Show this thread -
And fin.
@MalwareTechLab has a hearing today that I won't attend bc I've escaped to the UK, where the weather actually is nice, not like MI and WI. As@nycsouthpaw said, he's likely to lose the Miranda challenge, bc Miranda has withered and died. But that's setup for trial.Show this thread -
But those briefs on device/wiretap/those elusive 10 computers that got damaged? Hoo boy. Which may be why they've decided to go the superseding route.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There seem to be an excessive number of typos in this. “Easter district,” “overact”, etc. This was written by professional lawyers, wasn’t it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.