You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
1) Richard Armitage public admitted he leaked it and told Fitzgerald. 2) Miller recanted. 3) this is the first time I've ever heard any mention of notes. 4) Libby was convicted on lying not for leaking. 5) Leaking an operatives name is a crime - why wasn’t Armitage indicted?
WOWOWOWOW. If you don't even know about Libby's notes then you are ... completely unfamiliar with teh trial that found him guilty. Funny you should claim to know what happened then.
It's more than funny that you don't know about Armitage. Or do you and you chose to omit pertinent facts in your article?
It's not pertinent to the fact that Libby obstructed an investigation into whether Cheney ordered him to leak Plame's ID, which the evidence introduced at trial overwhelmingly supported he did.
"Fitzgerald ..didn't charge Armitage because it didn't fit his political goal of getting Dick Cheney" Fitzgerald didn't charge Libby's boss because Libby obstructed justice and lied under oath. He did get Illinois Gov. George Ryan, a Republican, on corruption, 6.5yr sentence.pic.twitter.com/3CnBtEq873
I think it's a rule of thumb that Illinois state politicians spend time in jail.
Miller did not recant under oath, and her own notes back her sworn testimony. She also hasn't revealed some of her other interesting sources (Cheney refused to divulge what journos he spoke with either).
As to Armitage, it is true that when two journos who asked the same nonsensical Q, he IDed Plame, whom he didn't know was covert. He also told FBI that. Libby, however, hid that he did precisely the same thing. Lots of reason to believe Libby knew she was covert.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
