We do know what happened in the Plame case @emptywheel We know Cheney didn’t order Libby to leak her name. How? BECAUSE WE KNOW RICHARD ARMITAGE LEAKED THE NAME TO BOB NOVAK. This was missing in your @nytopinion story. What a coincidence. 
Oh. Then Libby's note and GJ testimony abt leaking classified stuff to Judy Miller on Cheney's orders and Judy's testimony saying he shared Plame's ID just go away?
-
-
Clearly you didn’t hear what Judy just said about that. . Again, Armitage was the leaker. This isn’t hard.
-
That wasn't her sworn testimony. I'll take her sworn testimony over what she says after the fact. And that doesn't explain Libby's note, GJ, Cheney's GJ, Addington's testimony. Or Libby's acceptance of pardon.
-
Still doesn’t explain why you didn’t mention that Armitage first leaked Plame’s name to Novak. He was the leaker.
-
Because the record shows unexplained convos bt White House and Novak before Armitage, and shows BOTH journos asked Armitage Qs that were out of context leading questions.
-
It also shows a convo w/Novak Libby hid, and still unexplained classified info in the Novak column.
-
Cheney, btw, wouldn't share what convos he had w/journos. And neither Novak nor Judy revealed all their sources.
-
Novak admitted in his book The Prince of Darkness that it was Armitage who gave him the name. Armitage himself revealed to CBS in 2006 that he inadvertently gave the name to Novak. Your
#SloppyJournalism is why people don’t trust the news. This could have been in your article. -
Do you know how many times Novak's story changed, without ever fully explaining his column?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.