Let put my Q about Access Hollywood a different way, since few seem to understand it. If Mueller had reason to believe that the Access Hollywood evidence at Cohen's office will indicate coordination with the WikiLeaks release, do you think Rosenstein would have referred it?
-
Show this thread
-
People imagining that kind of logic are making the same [ahem] assumptions that
@RonDeSantisFL is, asking what connection there is. If there was a known connection, Rosenstein wouldn't have referred it. It just so happens Cohen is crooked independent of being crooked wrt RU.3 replies 5 retweets 32 likesShow this thread -
Yes, it's very exciting we have a sex scandal!!! But the nifty thing abt Trump is he offers scandals of many flavors: sex scandals, corruption scandals, international spy scandals.
4 replies 15 retweets 58 likesShow this thread -
For those suggesting that Rosenstein may have referred this to get a clean team--I think that's quite likely, but still speculative. That said, Rosenstein did NOT referMelissa Laurenza interview OR the Skadden Arps investigation, both of which also implicate attorney client.
6 replies 2 retweets 21 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @emptywheel
Sure but did those involve seizure of documents and electronics?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Unclear we know how hard Mueller worked to make sure van Zwaan turned everything over.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.