I feel like they should’ve asked for more time to respond to the two additional oppositions dropping tonight (iirc) too. They’ve got a lot of homework to do.
-
-
I'm still waiting for the deep-dive profile of the mysterious Sara Carter
-
Does anyone know if Sara Carter has been discredited for any of her work or her weedy analysis?https://www.earnthenecklace.com/sara-carter-wiki-fox-news-career-facts/ …
-
Yes. Over and over and over. WHich is why those of us who know even a teeny bit about FISA make jokes about it. Because she's an out and out shitshow on the topic.
-
Can you link to any articles or reports in the press where she was forced to redact or delete incorrect reporting?
-
She doesn't redact (tho this story she made to clarifications that made the problems worse). But I've been laughing my ass off at her shitshow since last year. She's totally ignorant not just about the law, but even what the document she's been handed are.
-
The Mediate article is correct in that she is doggedly chasing the FISA story. She seems to have a source(s). There are people who have no problem with the push for the original unredacted FISA documents to be produced for the HPSCI. Why would the DOJ & the FBI balk?
-
Because 1) it's clear this is not about oversight, 2) it's clear if it were about oversight this HPSCI would do nothing to fix it 3) her sources also know fuckall 4) this process has led to leaks, all to protect a suspected spy.
-
1. What would you call it? The Partisan Conspiracy Busters? What would Dems call it? 2. That remains to be seen, however I suspect your statement would be true of a different group of HPSCI Reps as well. 3. They know enough. She is getting info other reporters aren’t.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Or that she was appointed by Obama.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.