Weren’t they DNC docs in attachments within Podesta emails? So they could have also been stored on the DNC server as well?
It would be helpful for people reporting on Guccifer 2.0 to specify that first docs released by him are NOT known to be DNC docs. A mistake all sides make. Half are Podesta docs. The detail may be important for other parts of Mueller investigation story. https://www.thedailybeast.com/exclusive-lone-dnc-hacker-guccifer-20-slipped-up-and-revealed-he-was-a-russian-intelligence-officer …pic.twitter.com/rapkCn3UMG
-
-
-
They were Dem docs. Unclear whose docs they were.
-
I think DNC had them, and Podesta also sent them in attachments but I could be wrong.
-
You could be wrong. Maybe a good idea to assume unless you have evidence to the contrary you are.
-
Yes, my recollection was of the directory folders posted by Gucc 2 with some of the same files listed there. From what I’m seeing now, those screen shots haven’t been verified to be authentic.
-
So. You have no evidence and are ignoring the evidence to the contrary. Gotcha.
-
No, I was agreeing with you now. The evidence I remembered isn’t reliable. It’s been a while.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Should the people who took data from him and used it to cut campaign ads be worried?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's because the first curated WikiLeaks ones with search box were all DNC. That's what the press and the rest of us began really reacting to.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.