You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Still unclear in all the reporting on Trump's attempt to find lawyers who'll simultaneously advise him competently (failed attempts to hire Flood or Olson) and indulge is worst instincts (Di Genova) is how or whether Di Genova can even manage conflict problem.
I mean, if Di Genova CAN'T resolve conflict posed by his wife repping Clovis, Prince, and (most importantly) Corallo, then Trump would have lost Dowd w/o getting Di Genova.
From Tuesday: Trump's Legal Team: "If the Law and the Facts Are Against You, Pound the Table and Yell Like Hell” https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/03/20/if-the-law-and-the-facts-are-against-you-pound-the-table-and-yell-like-hell/ … Picking Di Genova over Dowd is clear admission from Trump that the facts and law are against him.
Wonder how many of the 17 + 1 lawyers in Robert Mueller's office managed to suppress a smirk when they read this? https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/22/us/politics/john-dowd-resigns-trump-lawyer.html?smid=tw-nytpolitics&smtyp=cur …pic.twitter.com/pqQ2PaIKO4
Rhetorical, so if Di Genova can't resolve conflicts, Sekulow is "1st chair?" Trump can't be happy with Jay's quote "...and we will continue to cooperate fully with the special counsel.” Trump's bullpen is Dershowitz--who doesn't appear interested--and @ LegalAidDC?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
