You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
The point of all this is to win. By definition, more effective = winning. As a critic of Clinton's campaign - I believe she should have and could have won - it's possible she had equivalent tools. What she didn't have was an equivalent campaign. Trump beat her (Fairly or not)
If she had equivalent tools (she spent millions on digital, so I sure hope she did), then you'd need to make a case that building psychographics illegally made the margin. Otherwise it's just execution.
Sure, but that’s huge. I’ve no way, nor does anyone else, of making a technical judgement at this point. We can say, though, they knew where to go and what to do, and were markedly effective in doing that. We’re probably saying the same thing in different ways!
Yeah. I'm just saying that CA making difference (if it did) only matters if making the difference relied on using illegal data rather than just better execution.
She might have equivalent tools, but may not have had equivalent information. That’s the key point. It also misses the big picture, which is another level of criminality involved in the Trump campaign.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
