Not really. As @emptywheel notes, any trial involving classified information & CIPA isn't going to happen in that window. So, one could insist on a speedy trial but would be forgoing potentially significant evidence that would be readily available but for classification https://twitter.com/JoKEas2/status/973277490469851136 …
-
-
Lol. You call me an idiot. You are the dumbfuck that says she should make a determination whether it should be classified. SMDH
-
Where did I say that? I didn't. You invented that out of whole cloth!
-
"It does matter whether it should have been classified. " Your exact words.
-
OK. Thanks. Now point to me in that quote where the subject is "she," Reality Winner.
-
Who are we talking about.? Not some other joe blow.
-
Well, you DO know that the *government* charged her, right? They just some other joe blow? Golly is this so difficult?
-
For you apparently it is. For me it's black and white. For the gov, according to you, it is, if they over charged her. Pretty simple to me she broke 798.Should be charged with that and any other codes she broke.Trial,And if found guilty . Punished according to presiding judge.
-
"And if found guilty." WOWWEEEE, you're coming along nicely. By end of day you might have your head halfway out of your arse. Now then. How does her guilt or innocence get determined?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.