You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Her defense is a piss poor one. She took a classified document and gave it to a media outlet. Doesn't matter whether it should have been classified or not. Not her decision to make on its classification.
It does matter whether it should have been classified. Espionage is about NDI. If this was not credibly NDI, she should be found not guilty.
No it doesn't matter. It had a classified classification. She released it. We can't have people deciding on their own that something shouldn't be classified and then releasing it.
Again, the law does not prohibit leaking of "classified" information. It prohibits leaks of "National Defense Information." So the govt has to prove it was NDI.
18 us code 798. It's against the law to release classified material. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/798 … NDI doesn't matter.
Can you point to where in this indictment it charges 798? https://standwithreality.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/090617-072-prosec-updated-indictment.pdf … Thanks.
Haven't read it don't care. If they didn't indict her under 798 then they screwed up. She broke the law per 798.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
