So is the best understanding of the week that was Nunberg that 1) he shaded the truth to hide someone else's criminal activity in his interview 2.5 weeks ago, 2) was immediately offered immunity to clear that up for the GJ 3) it took 6.5 hours to do so?
-
-
This was interesting, not sure what to make of it:https://twitter.com/hsu_spencer/status/972235152540798977 …
-
I have my theories but not sharing yet. May reflect two different goals.
-
Nunberg's laryngitis clears up today
The Nunberg meltdown over "Roger & Me" combined w/@stoneonstyle in London &@JulianAssange teasing the visit seems maybe related, what what?http://abcn.ws/2GdUhl3 -
Key data from this interview w/
#Nunberg
A "source" says Nunberg "not done testifying"
May need to come back "5 more times"!
Betting is the source is Nunberg's lawyer & this sure sounds like a very cooperative witness, non? -
Cooperating to secure immunity
-
Sounds like it, huh?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That seems about right….and assuming Mueller already had those emails without the subpoena he knew he was already kind of screwed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No immunity for testimony, though, as his big show was meant to demolish his credibility as a witness to avoid being called, right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We might know more if
@AriMelber hadn’t cut off Nunberg when he said “they want something” in exchange for offer of immunity. So we won’t know what GJ hit him w/unless he goes public again. GJ experience obviously nothing like his interview.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.