The Trump Marketing Company server story gets whackier each time it is retold.https://twitter.com/AJentleson/status/971556568549470211 …
-
-
Someday hope to hear more
-
Yes - I'm familiar w/these pro & cons & have followed debate There is not enough info from the DNS lookups alone to determine if something fishy was going on - would need the underlying traffic to tell this Some good pros say it's fishy, some say innocuous I'd need more data
-
The point was that this was worthy of discussion: DeVos (Prince?)/Trump/Alfa Bank should explain their interaction. FBI/NYTimes shut it down -not tech people - with "no trump russia connection". It was data. It was true. There was a connection. No one cared.
-
Did you really miss all the tech people who blew this theory up repeatedly? Did you miss that Spectrum (NOT DeVos, no matter how many times you repeat that hoax) did explain it, as has Alfa?
-
No tech people have "explained" it. Rob objected to the use of data. Some anonymous consultant claimed it was spam, while producing neither DNS records nor spam. Alfa Bank sent me multiple FOIA letters. Alfa Bank takes it seriously. You want to own no TrumpRussia? You do you.
-
Um. You're missing 3 different other entities.
-
You are literally pointing to your "but her emails" story & NYTimes FBI "no Trump Russia" as reasons the data are, somehow related to your body? That is the basis you use to commit to not re-examining your coverage. Then you echo Hannity, accusing me of a hoax. That is just sad.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think not. The data are there. The communication is there. As to what it is, an actual reporter would have to be engaged enough for there to be discovery.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.