18 days after I lay out how ConFraudUs is central theory of Mueller case(s),
https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/02/17/the-conspiracy-to-defraud-the-united-states-backbone-of-the-internet-research-agency-and-manafort-indictments/ …
and a week after I expand it in NYT
http://nyti.ms/2FFDhnr
@benjaminwittes discovers it.https://www.lawfareblog.com/about-russia-indictment-robert-muellers-legal-theory-and-where-it-takes-him-next …
Your obstinance on this point is especially absurd that I address the specific legal context in which ConFraudUs works WRT the known crimes in front of us.
-
-
in anything involving Weissman, I'm biased by
@SidneyPowell1's exposure of his egregious prosecutorial misconduct. It's regrettable that such an unscrupulous partisan is involved in a matter where it's important that justice be done and that it be done with clean hands. -
You're arguing he's a partisan bc he applauded federal law be followed?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.