Great, I hope @JaneMayerNYer answers them.
And also how she neglected to include Guccifer 2.0 in the piece.
And a bunch of other questions, but those two are a good start.
-
I can't explain the discrepancy but
@Isikoff can.
-
-
In the very podcast you sent as proof that Isikoff relied on Steele for his article, he says at 9:02, and I quote, "If you take a look at our story of our September 23rd...that did not rely on what Christopher Steele told me." That's a discrepancy.
-
And he's not talking about the substance of the Page meeting. He's talking about the FBI investigation (tho he admits he Steele also told him about that, which conflicts with sworn testimony). Again, Isikoff said he relied on Steele as early as Jan 2017. Stop inventing otherwise.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.