The great Jane Mayer joins the long line of people who ignore the Guccifer 2.0 release to make Steele look better (and repeats other errors we've seen over and over).https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/03/12/christopher-steele-the-man-behind-the-trump-dossier …
-
-
And this part is interesting (tho as Mayer notes, Romney was never a likely choice), but raises real questions why this report wasn't included in the dossier to McCain or the one that got released.pic.twitter.com/75MziUSdCW
Show this thread -
1) Steele got the kind of dirt wrong. 2) Steele didn't catch on to the hack-and-leak until long after everyone else had (thus the import of the G2.0 mention).pic.twitter.com/30QHhHVRHG
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Piece devalued itself when first graph claimed Steele getting phone call then saying carries phones in Faraday bag. Mayer also makes it seem Steele was hired before Dems started paying GPS. Lots of other wrong details ...
-
Yes, I agree, the timeline on Steele's hiring is wrong.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Oh no, is this going to be used to revive the Seth rich conspiracy ?
-
Possible. Not sure how it'd relate to the dossier tho.
-
That Russian diplomat dying on Election Day was always bizarre to me.
-
Is this a decent list of the possible deaths the article could be referring to?https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/03/24/europe/dead-russians/index.html …
-
Most likely yeah.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Peter Smith?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How many Russians suspiciously died or were arrested around the time the Trump administration gained security clearances?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.