The great Jane Mayer joins the long line of people who ignore the Guccifer 2.0 release to make Steele look better (and repeats other errors we've seen over and over).https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/03/12/christopher-steele-the-man-behind-the-trump-dossier …
-
-
-
And this part is interesting (tho as Mayer notes, Romney was never a likely choice), but raises real questions why this report wasn't included in the dossier to McCain or the one that got released.pic.twitter.com/75MziUSdCW
Show this thread -
1) Steele got the kind of dirt wrong. 2) Steele didn't catch on to the hack-and-leak until long after everyone else had (thus the import of the G2.0 mention).pic.twitter.com/30QHhHVRHG
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Man, that is sloppy writing. FBI briefing on Trump campaign involvement doesn't mean that they mentioned their sources. Ack! Thbbft!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.