emptywheel

If you ignore the second part of the meeting I guess, the one with someone with direct ties to Putin.

No, I'm including that. Do you have a working theory for how each of these events could plausibly involve real offers of HRC emails, yet: a- each involves having no contacts for that b- each is followed by still looking for that c- knowing there were no HRC emails throughout

Given that none of what you just said matches known reality, I'm not even sure how to respond, except to say you seem to be missing a whole slew of facts.

That's an unconvincing cop-out. So unfortunately the March, April, May, June, July, Oct, Sept events referenced here need this secret reference to clue us into how none of these events predates/follows the others. Theoretical physics book is it?

Not a secret reference. You apparently have no clue what's in the public record.

Let's chalk that up as a 'no' then. You don't have a theory for how this would plausibly work as a RU state offer in April. Bonus points for referring me to the public record for to a development you alone have hypothesised from tea leaf reading a redacted sentence & a tweet

I'm not even sure what youre suggesting the problem is, just that several of things you assert as true are in fact not true. So can you define the problem here, but do it with actual facts?

Let's start with the fact that you seem to have no fucking clue what universe of stolen documents include. None. Zero.