Does it? Wouldn't it mean that a full month after a theorised emails release offer to the campaign, the campaign was unaware that was arranged and approached an unrelated matter as genuine, without the benefit of contacts to guide them?
-
I'm not even sure what youre suggesting the problem is, just that several of things you assert as true are in fact not true. So can you define the problem here, but do it with actual facts?
Let's start with the fact that you seem to have no fucking clue what universe of stolen documents include. None. Zero.
-
-
It's a pretty simple question really. When you were speculating that both the Mat-Apr Mifsud contacts & June meeting both involved Hillary's emails & those were the same as the DNC emails, what about that made sense to you?
-
Is this your working theory of this plot? Apr - Russian govt offers emails Apr - Russian govt makes arrangements for public dump instead Jun - Meeting arranged for emails too Jul - DNC emails dump Jul-Sep - Does anyone have any lead on those emails, does anyone know any Russians
-
Wow. You're dumb. Dumbdumbdumbdumb. You don't understand thing one about what you're talking about.
-
I feel responsible: my tweet quoting your piece seems to have been this naif's point of entry into your mentions. My sincerest apologies.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.