(Thread:) So far as we know, #SCOTUS has never heard a #FISA appeal.
But the dispute pending in the FISA Court of Review over @ACLU's standing (& right) to seek public disclosure of secret FISC rulings could be a compelling candidate.
The problem is how to invoke #SCOTUS's JX:
-
-
Replying to @steve_vladeck @ACLU
If SCOTUS has never heard a FISA appeal then why did they change the law on that point in the 702 reauthorization? https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/10/20/technical-fixes-in-hjc-bill-suggest-scotus-may-have-reviewed-a-2015-fisa-application/ …
1 reply 2 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @ACLU
As I understand it, the changes were focused on the Court of Review, and both the timing of its review & its inherent authority. So the question is whether it's more plausible that
#SCOTUS heard a secret appeal no one knows about, or whether the#FISCR did, prompting these fixes.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @steve_vladeck @ACLU
Yeah, I think the delay in providing a record for its decision before sending to SCOTUS implies they had to send something to SCOTUS and got hung up on the immediate record. But thanks for the AFAWK!
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @ACLU
Just to nerd this into the ground, even if
#SCOTUS requested the record, that wouldn't establish that it took the case; the Justices often request lower-court records in _deciding_ whether to grant certiorari (or other forms of appellate relief).1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Oh, now there's a possibility I hadn't thought of. Which would explain why FISCR got authority of oversee compliance.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.