Honest questions for my legal eagles: * Where is the FISA court on the subject of competing public memos? * If the allegation is the FBI lied to the court, shouldn’t the proper venue for redress be the FISC? * Do you predict the co-equal judiciary will weigh in on all of this?
-
-
Replying to @joshscampbell
1) Silent, as I imagine it will remain. 2) It depends on whether, even if there was a misrepresentation (color me skeptical), it was material under Franks v. Delaware. If not, there’s nothing to remedy. 3) There’s neither a reason nor a mechanism for it to do so.
5 replies 3 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @steve_vladeck @joshscampbell
(1) Unfortunately silent. (2) If "lies" then redress would be with Court, although I do think there is an oversight role for Congress to play given some Committee access to underlying applications. (3) I don't see why FISC could/would not order DOJ/FBI to respond if desired
3 replies 2 retweets 4 likes -
Some other avenues: - Page would clearly have standing to sue (but could run into other weird problems) - Ordinarily, DOJ OPR would review allegations of misconduct against attorneys - If it's ever used in a criminal case, suppression motion.
4 replies 2 retweets 7 likes -
Saying Page and "weird" in the same sentence is neither unique nor would dissuade him from trying!
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
I mean, as a spectator, that would be a fascinating case to watch. And at the rate we're going, maybe the whole thing will be unclassified by then.
5 replies 1 retweet 4 likes
Assume you all saw that Gartenlaub just noticed the memo wars. https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/02/24/keith-gartenlaub-notes-that-trump-and-both-parties-now-support-releasing-fisa-applications/ … Which is actually a far more interesting case than Page.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.