The “Russian asset” that cooperated previously with intel on the prosecution of actual Russian assets in 2013? 
https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/968248579973316608 …
-
?? As far as we know Page has been forthright in every regard in this investigation. Show me otherwise.
Schiff notes two areas (one redacted) where Page lied to HPSCI. Does that count?
-
-
You know the answer.
Schiff would have written anything in that memo to obfuscate.
-
And yet Trump agreed that that allegation should remain classified. So Trump is part of it now too, huh? Clever.
-
Or it revealed “sources and methods” like many of the other redactions. You’re projecting what you want to be true, not what is true. It’s just a bit comical that you’ve decided one lie (two), intentional or unintentional, is indicative of Page being a “Russian asset”.
-
1) Something is only a source or method if it's true. 2) I don't actually WANT RU spies to have infiltrated the Trump campaign. It's actually alarming it may have been. But the evidence is increasingly strong it was.
-
Increasingly strong? Come on man.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.