maybe you're just fucking dense. so let me spell it out again: there is no evidence these documents came from a breach of a "DNC server." there is evidence they came from elsewhere.
-
(a) I'm not interested in it being RU, I find Binney/VIPS position most convincing (b) I conceded the June issue early on, but u pushed it as a "gotcha" so I played along, expecting to reach closure, something like what u just posted, altho I'd also expect references (cont'd)
The reason the Binney (note not all VIPS buy what you wrongly call the VIPS theory) is utterly wrong is he doesn't account for the multiple servers being hacked. So again, you're believing something unsustainable w/fact of multiple server hacks.
-
-
Are we talking about this (first memo Dec 2016)?https://consortiumnews.com/2016/12/12/us-intel-vets-dispute-russia-hacking-claims/ …
-
Yes. A number of VIPs members have criticized that, rightly. Are you really so unaware of these details you don't even know THAT? Wow you're ill-equipped to play this game.
-
Can u show me evidence of criticism by VIPS members of the Dec 2016 memo? I think you're thinking of the July 2017 memo.
-
Sorry--you're right.
-
Tho I will say I had a convo w/Binney after that and ... he had no evidence.
-
But the central point of Dec 2016 memo is the absence of evidence contraposed to NSA's capability to trace any hack.
-
By the way, the internal VIPS criticism of the July 2017 memo was specific to download speed, not to VIPS' general critique of Russian hacking allegation (expressed in Dec 2016). A good example of this is Scott Ritter's criticism of July 2017 http://bit.ly/2hZFClg (cont'd)
-
You may recall that Ritter wrote a critique of the NYT Papadopoulos-Mifsud story that I shared w you a while back:http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/in-the-russian-collusion-debate-whos-fooling-who/ …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.