You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
How do you feel abt McGahn's position? I keep arguing he's the one being targeted for obstruction, not Trump directly. And ... as I think you can attest, there is precedent.
No he's not. Because you're never going to charge a POTUS with that. But you WILL charge a WHCO (or a press aide like Hope Hicks), as Dean can attest, with that.
You'll never charge a president with obstruction??? Bill Clinton?
You're right. I shouldn't have said "you're." I should have said "Mueller." I don't think he will, nor will he have to.
Hate making assumptions—you seem to imply by “nor will he have to” that Mueller can “get” to Trump (i.e. force him to resign) by getting gj to indict t’s closest aides & family, maybe?
Or that any charges against him as unindicted co-conspirator will be far more substantial than obstruction.
E.g., ConFraudUS
That was Nixon's main impeachment charge
I noted earlier I was wrong to say "you're." I don't think Mueller is going to. Nor do I think he'll need to.
Trump, I mean. Honest question.
I think Trump is guilty of obstruction. But if he's named unindicted co-conspirator on that it'll just be gravy.
I forgot Mueller has nothing to do with impeachment. That's Congress' job. Which they won't do.
This Congress won't. But if stuff that would permanently damage the GOP brand comes out, Congress might.
Don't you think it's time we change that? WHY is the President above the law? Seriously, if a President commits felonious acts, he should face the justice system just like any other American!
Hicks is next.
What's it like in Delusionville?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
