Schiff Memo Reveals that Mifsud Specifically Told Papadopoulos Russia Would Release Hillary Emails *to Help Trump Campaign* https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/02/24/schiff-memo-reveals-that-mifsud-specifically-told-papadopoulos-russia-would-release-hillary-emails-to-help-trump-campaign/ … This makes the June 9 meeting even more damning.
-
-
I must have missed it. Where are the emails released in that story?
-
OK, DNC emails not released until July. Doesn't contradict my argument (which I corrected to include July) that Dem memo undercuts NYT theory (below) that Mifsud showed foreknowledge of *DNC email* release, since memo correctly says Mifsud spoke of *Hillary* not *DNC* emails.pic.twitter.com/W7VHgPMMds
-
I'm not interested in NYT theory. I'm interested in publicly known facts. I thought that's what we were arguing about?
-
My original tweet said Dem memo undercuts story (that began w NYT) that Mifsud revealed to Papadopoulos foreknowledge of the DNC email releases, thus triggering investigation. We got sidetracked into facts. Here's the original, which I corrected for July https://twitter.com/paulsurovell/status/967566370643824641 …
This Tweet is unavailable. -
Oh. I thought you were interested in facts. My bad. Carry on then. Also, there is abundant reason to believe that Pap informed the campaign, but that's another issue.
-
Well, you cleared up one fact and I thank you for that.
-
Which is ... that you're still missing the outlet that released emails in June, and you have no idea where those emails came from?
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
The premise is that Mifsud's offer of Hillary emails revealed foreknowledge of emails leaked "2 months later" -- June and July -- by WL and DCLeaks. But how many of those leaked emails were Hillary's?pic.twitter.com/hIoCb1yyxi
-
Why don't you go learn some details about those emails and come back. I've said 2X already you're LOL wrong.
-
I'll concede that I'm wrong if you can document that Hillary Clinton emails were released in June and July, which is the premise of the alleged Mifsud offer per the Dem memo. Waiting for you to back up your claim.
-
No. I don't do labor on demand. I'm not your research assistant, have nothing to prove to you. You, however, have proven you don't know WTF you're talking about. Bye.
-
If it takes "labor" I can only conclude that you don't have the documentation for such a simple question. Or maybe it doesn't exist.
-
Or maybe I think you're lazy and like to mouth off about stuff you haven't done the work to mouth off on? Why are you so lazy?
-
Well I've presented documentation for my argument, I've done my work. You're rebuttal is "You're wrong." I'll let that speak for itself.
-
No. It's not. It's that EVEN your answers betray that you don't know WTF you're talking about. You just keep embarrassing yourself. I'll wait for you to study up. I'll be here if you ever do that.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.