I think he's been trying to distract from obvious ties bt the clearance and the investigation. Hard to refute the obvious implication here.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @lrozen
How likely content of Rosenstein call (fortnight ago) came from info provided by Gates (proffer session - Feb 1st) ? As they say in legal world, there are not too many co-incidences?
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
-
-
Replying to @AndytweetM @lrozen
There re 5 prosecution teams. No reason the Manafort/Gates one would be most likely. https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/02/17/updated-mueller-docket-census-we-still-dont-know-what-6-prosecutors-are-doing/ …
3 replies 3 retweets 11 likes -
All registered Democrats and expanded scope examining Trump's business dealings with other countries, not just Russia?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
"registered" Democrats? Got a link for that? Also that Trump (as opposed to Kushner) business dealings are being examined?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Aren't you glad you asked?http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5422645/Muellers-team-revealed-13-registered-Democrats.html …
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Do you want a list of all the obvious glaring errors in that piece, or do you just want to keep looking for one that supports your "all" claim? I can wait.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You're the one saying there are "glaring errors" so knock yourself out. And yes, it looks increasingly like a fishing expedition, as if the Strzok/Page texts weren't evidence enough. Carry on with your reporting on minor players being indicted.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Nah bro. If you can't understand that 16 =/= 17 and 13 =/= 16, you're not worth arguing with.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.